Archive for 2006/02


A Question - 5:27PM, 2006/02/26

What in the hell does Google have to do with cars?

Bud, Not Buddy - 3:54PM, 2006/02/25

2000 Newbery Medal Winner: Bud, not Buddy, by Christopher Paul Curtis

(+ *crickets*)

In Short
While I’m not sure everyone would enjoy this book, it’s definitely a fine example of historical fiction and would do very well for a book report. Even though certain parts of the plot were very easy to figure out, the fact is, this wasn’t a mystery, so I can’t really take points away for that. There is a death, but it took place several years before the start of the narrative, and the main character doesn’t dwell on it too much. I give it an 8/10.

The View from Saturday - 3:56PM, 2006/02/23

1997 Newbery Medal Winner: The View from Saturday, by E. L. Konigsburg

(+ Lets all move one place on)

In Short
Quite a good read, especially for those of us who enjoy reading about gifted and talented children when they actually get to be gifted and talented instead of cast in a stereotypical nerd supporting role and looked down upon by the others. A poor choice in the speech pattern of one of the characters prevents this from being what I would consider an excellent book, but it’s still above average. 8/10.

<3 Katamari - 7:22PM, 2006/02/17

From the makers of Katamari Damacy, we now have Katamari Damacy 2 in Flash.

Aspartame - 5:55PM, 2006/02/15

I’m running a bit behind on my book reviews; I’ve now got 4 in the queue. I’ll try to knock some of them off over the next few days.

But for right now, I draw attention to this article from the NY Times.

The gist: What seems like a reputable study has finally proved that aspartame (like saccharine) can increase cancer rates in rats.

This, however, is not really the bit that interests me, because, frankly, it’s not that much of a surprise. I really think that most any chemical consumed to excess is likely to cause something wonky to happen in your body, and if such things are taken in moderation, the risk is probably not too high. Though I think I’ll still turn down that plutonium sandwich.

No, the part that interests me is this (emphasis mine):

Others have also challenged Searle’s studies. Documents from the F.D.A. and records from the Federal Register indicate that, in the years before the F.D.A. approved aspartame, the agency had serious concerns about the accuracy and credibility of Searle’s aspartame studies. From 1977 to 1985 — during much of the approval process — Searle was headed by Donald H. Rumsfeld, who is now the secretary of defense; Searle was acquired by Monsanto in 1985. Monsanto later spun Searle’s assets out into two companies: Merisant, which owns the brands Equal and Canderel, and NutraSweet, which is owned by J. W. Childs Equity Partners, an investment firm in Boston.

A 1976 report from an F.D.A. task force, for example, found that Searle’s studies on aspartame and several of the company’s pharmaceutical drugs were “poorly conceived, carelessly executed, or inaccurately analyzed or reported.” It cited what it called a lack of training by the scientists analyzing tissue samples, a “substantial” loss of information because of tissue decomposition and inadequate monitoring of feeding doses.

In response to the report, the F.D.A. asked the Justice Department to open a grand jury investigation into whether two of Searle’s aspartame studies had been falsified or were incomplete. In a 33-page letter in 1977, Richard A. Merrill, the F.D.A.’s chief counsel at the time, recommended to Samuel K. Skinner, then the United States attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, that a grand jury investigate the company, which was based in the Chicago suburb of Skokie, for “concealing material facts and making false statements in reports of animal studies conducted to establish the safety of the drug Aldactone and the food additive aspartame.”

A grand jury was never convened, however. Shortly after the letter was sent, Mr. Skinner left the Justice Department to join Sidley & Austin, a law firm that represented Searle. After 12 years at that firm, now Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Mr. Skinner was appointed to be President George H. W. Bush’s transportation secretary; later he became his chief of staff. In 1978, a year and half after Mr. Skinner left the United States attorney’s office in Chicago, his deputy, William F. Conlon, also left to work at Sidley & Austin.

Could these people POSSIBLY be MORE corrupt?

Out of the Dust - 12:26PM, 2006/02/14

1998 Newbery Medal Winner: Out of the Dust, by Karen Hesse

(+ Almost Not Worth Cutting)

In Short
This was a stupid book. I find it very hard to believe that out of all the books published in 1997 this was the best one. Don’t bother to read this — if you want to read about the depression, I suggest Grapes of Wrath, or perhaps one of the other Newbery winners to be set in that time period. 0/10.

A Year Down Yonder - 12:24PM, 2006/02/11

2001 Newbery Medal Winner: A Year Down Yonder, by Richard Peck

(+ You know the drill)

In Short
Overall, while I did enjoy the book (possibly enough to pick up the book it’s sequel to, but not right away), I can’t say I found it really special in any way. I give it a 7/10 for sheer inoffensiveness.

Non sucking Garfield - 11:03PM, 2006/02/10

I used to like Garfield when I was little. I liked the drawing style with the giant eyes and the round characters. I never really considered it to be funny, though, even then. I remember reading books of strips and hardly laughing at all.

When I got older, I stopped reading it altogether and am of the opinion now that it’s a terrible, one-note strip. Foxtrot repeats itself a lot, but it hits a clever note at least once a month, and that’s a pretty good rate for a daily. Garfield is lucky if it does it once a year.

This article was thus very intriguing. And so incredibly true. It’s amazing what a difference there is between the strips. I might actually read the second one.

A Single Shard - 8:34PM, 2006/02/09

2002 Newbery Medal Winner: A Single Shard, by Linda Sue Park

(+ Spoilers ho)

In Short
Overall, I enjoyed this book quite a bit, though the first half was better than the second. Much like the Little House books, it spends a lot of time talking about the process of creating something in a time with different technology, and that always holds my attention. The resolution, however, was trite, and there’s an automatic 1.5 point deduction for using an unnecessary death to advance the plot. 7.5/10 reduced to 6/10.

Crispin the Cross of Lead - 8:33PM, 2006/02/09

2003 Newbery Medal Winner: Crispin the Cross of Lead, by Avi

(+ Spoiler Warning)

Overall, while I can’t say this book inspired me to raptures, it was a solid enough story. The setting and point of view are what really made it stand out, as the middle ages are more often seen through the eyes of a royal or noble rather than one raised as a serf. I’d give it a 7/10.