J’s Take on Skyfall by Catherine Asaro

Skyfall cover

Skyfall cover
Skyfall comes first in the internal chronology of Asaro’s Skolian Empire series, but was not the first book published in it. This is the first one I’ve read, though I will eventually have to read more to catch up to Quantum Rose, which won the Nebula in 2001. (Look for it in The Nebula Project in October of 2012 if we keep up our current pace.)

I didn’t know too much about the book or the series going into it. Just that it was classified as space opera, and that there were quite a lot of books. And that it was written by a woman. So parallels to Bujold’s Vorkosigan Saga were inevitable. I liked that, so why shouldn’t I like this? And why haven’t I read any of this before?

I’m not quite sure what to make of Skyfall. On the one hand, I did enjoy parts of it, and might even enjoy it more on a second read. But mostly throughout the book, I had a feeling of… I don’t know where this is going. We start out with an important woman on her way to an important vote. And then the whole plot where I thought we were headed seems to get derailed as she ends up on this out-of-the-way planet and then.. gets kidnapped/wanders off into the mountains rather than wait for her ride home. Then it seems to be this bizarre romance story.

We start switching points of view between her and her son, and I start thinking about Dune. And what’s with all these books about men and their mothers?

Nearing the end of the book, it got really good. And by the time I finished reading it, I finally felt like I understood where all the earlier stuff had been headed and why it was there. Which is why I think I might enjoy it more on a reread. I think especially if I reread it after having read more of this series.

Because I do think, from my limited perspective at this point, that this book would’ve made more sense and been a more enjoyable read, had I had some background in this series before. So that maybe the proper way to read this series isn’t internal chronology, but by publication date.

But, I don’t know. I could be wrong. Barring memory disorders, you can’t read a series for the first time both ways and do a true comparison.

I did sneak a peek at the family tree at the back of this book. Enough to realize I did not want to look at it closely! There must definitely be spoilers in there for what comes ‘next’ (‘previously’). There’s a definite spoiler in there for this book, so I’ve warned my fellow TTers. I hope they heed the warning. I know the extras like this are more tempting for others than they are for me. I didn’t even look at the other supplemental information. Spoilers = Bad!

Will I read more of this series? Yes. But if I didn’t have Quantum Rose scheduled on my plate, I probably wouldn’t go back to this series so soon. I’m not dying to absorb all of them one after the other. To be fair though, I still have 2 Vorkosigan books I’m behind on. And I do love those. Maybe I’m just not much of a series marathoner.

Share

6 thoughts on “J’s Take on Skyfall by Catherine Asaro”

  1. It’s been quite a few years since I read the other books I’d read in this series, but I really have to say reading this one made way more sense than reading those without any background at all. So I’d plump for internal chronology over random book later in the series. Publication order, I don’t know.

  2. I dunno.. publication order, I’ll make the argument that you’re reading it in the order the author came up with it. (Leaving aside random bits of backstory they know and may have written that didn’t make it into the first book.) So that reading a prequel is just like reading a long flashback.

    The author, consciously or unconsciously, expects you to know certain things from the first books they’ve written. So.. it’s probably easier to read things in publication order. As long as you don’t mind the time leap.

  3. Jumping back and forth in time does bother me on a fundamental level in a book series. Not brief flashbacks so much, but I much prefer to read full fledged adventures in order of when they happened rather than the order of when they were written if those things differ. It’s just how my brain works.

  4. But if you watch Star Wars that way, there’s no big revelation ‘I am your father!’ Well, it’s a revelation for Luke, but not for you.

    Though I guess in whichever way you watch/read, there’s spoilers involved. Whether you know who Darth Vader is in relation to Luke, or you know where little annoying Anakin is going to wind up.

  5. Yeah. Of course, pretty much no one from our generation could possibly have watched SW in chronological order, so I can’t even really imagine how that might be. Eps 4-6 were so ingrained on my consciousness by the time the prequels were made it’s just an impossibility.

  6. Yea. It’ll be interesting when those kids who did manage to watch it in internal chronology order are old enough to be reminiscing about it on their (whatever the 2020 equivalent of a blog is). To see if their view of it is different from our generation. But Clone Wars might have also influenced them. I haven’t watched any of that.

    Not that I can reminisce about it much. We did have plastic masks and those plastic apron thing Halloween costumes for at least C3PO and Darth Vader. And some little plastic action figures. I remember C3PO and R2D2 specifically there.

    Once I saw Star Trek, I was definitely a Trekker and not a Star Wars fan. (Even if my first memory of Star Trek is the bugworm things in the ear in Wrath of Khan.)

    Not that I wouldn’t love a light saber, mind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *